Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Moto G51 5G, having a general score of 88.5 against 77.8. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Moto G51 5G, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a greater memory to store more games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G51 5G counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola Moto G51 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a camera with much more mega pixels and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.