Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Moto G60, with a overall score of 88.5 against 79.5. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features. Galaxy Z Flip is an older device than the Motorola Moto G60, but it is way thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processor than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G60, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G60 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Moto G60 shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.