Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Moto G60s, getting an 88.5 score against 79.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Moto G60s has Android 11 version. Galaxy Z Flip's body is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G60s. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto G60s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola Moto G60s has more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Moto G60s features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.