Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Moto G8 Plus, getting an 88.5 score against 77.6. Although Galaxy Z Flip and Moto G8 Plus were released with only 4 months difference, Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and just a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking display than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a little bigger display. The Moto G8 Plus shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.