Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is a little bit lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, although both were released only a couple of months apart. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a just a bit better display pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, a smaller camera aperture and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G8 Power, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.