Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G84's overall score of 80.9. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Motorola Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better performing processing unit than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G84 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little lower display density and a bit smaller display. The Motorola Moto G84's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The Moto G84 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Moto G84 also counts with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.