Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features. Although the Galaxy Z Flip and Moto G9 Play were only released 7 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip is a little lighter and much thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a sharper screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a way greater screen density, a little larger display and a way better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Moto G9 Play has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.