Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, getting a general score of 88.5 against 80.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Motorola Moto G9 Plus were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat lighter and notably thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite greater pixels number in each display inch.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.