Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a global score of 88.5 against 75.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it is somewhat heavier.
Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display pixel density. The Moto Z Force features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM. The Moto Z Force has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a lot worse resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.