Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is notably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen pixels density. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip has better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.