Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having an 88.5 score against 77.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z3, although it's a little thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing power than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little better pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.