Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Motorola One 5G, with an 88.5 score against 84.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Motorola One 5G, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Motorola One 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola One 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.