Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. Galaxy Z Flip's design is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola One 5G Ace, despite of the fact that it was released just 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a bit better screen density. Motorola One 5G Ace has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.