Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola One Action, having a global score of 88.5 against 78.5. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is a little bit heavier but notably thinner than the Motorola One Action, and they were released with only 6 months difference. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola One Action has more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Action, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.