Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. Although Galaxy Z Flip is just a little bit heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6% more battery size. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a way bigger sensor, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.