Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 88.5 against 80. The Galaxy Z Flip is a thinner and just a bit lighter device than the Motorola One Zoom, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Zoom takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a way bigger sensor, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Motorola One Zoom has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Zoom, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.