Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11, providing you a lot of extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola razr (2020), although both were released only a couple of months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Motorola razr (2020). They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit higher pixel density.
Motorola razr (2020)'s storage to install applications and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's one, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.