Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Nokia 7.2's global score of 75.9. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than the Nokia 7.2, and both were released only 5 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10, so it offers some extra features.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior CPU than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper display than Nokia 7.2, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Nokia 7.2 features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera and a lot tinier camera sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Nokia 7.2 features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.