Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Nokia 7.3, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Nokia 7.3 has Android 11 version, so it gives some nice extra features. Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processing unit than Nokia 7.3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better looking display than Nokia 7.3, because it has a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Nokia 7.3 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nokia 7.3 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Nokia 7.3, because it has more internal memory capacity. Nokia 7.3 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.