Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having an 88.5 score against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer and a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy Z Flip's battery duration, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has a 3320mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.