Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Nokia XR20, having an 88.5 score against 80.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Nokia XR20, it's design is a lot thinner and much lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Nokia XR20 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit lower screen density, they both have a screen with the same size.
Nokia XR20 features a slightly better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Nokia XR20 features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4630mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia XR20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia XR20, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.