Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a general score of 88.5 against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy Z Flip and OPPO Find X2 Neo were released only 3 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip body is just a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, they have equal internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a camera with much more megapixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.