Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a score of 88.5 against 77. Galaxy Z Flip is a a little thinner but just a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per inch of screen, a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's storage for games and applications is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 64 MP resolution camera.
Galaxy Z Flip features a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.