Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 general score. These phones use the same Android 12 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released just a little more than a year before.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a much higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.