Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 88.5 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an noticeably older cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but it is a little lighter and thinner anyway. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite smaller screen and a just a bit less pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.