Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Samsung Galaxy A22, getting a general score of 88.5 against 76.1. Galaxy Z Flip's body is a little lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22, although it was released about a year before. Both of these phones work with the same Android 12 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better looking display than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.