Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is a little lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A22 5G, although it was released around 17 months before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, giving a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a little greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.