Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is notably older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen and a quite smaller display.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality photos and videos and lower video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.