Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than Galaxy A30s's 79.8 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, so it gives lots of additional features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Galaxy A30s were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is just a little thinner but also a little heavier than the Galaxy A30s.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A30s features a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture and a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A30s counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.