Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A34, with an 88.5 score against 82.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A34, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a quite better display density and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot smaller sensor capturing lot lower quality videos and images and a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.