Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 88.5 score against 79.4. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip feature quite similar screens, although the Galaxy A35 5G has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a quite smaller display and a quite worse pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.