Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A41's 81.7 score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features and increased performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy A41 were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is heavier but a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A41 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A41 has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.