Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Galaxy A50, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 83.8. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and a little thinner device than the Galaxy A50, although it is also just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because it has a little larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite greater screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.