Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A50s's 86.6 score. Even though Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy A50s were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip body is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Galaxy A50s. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bit larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A50s shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features slightly more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.