Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's overall score of 88.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Galaxy Z Flip, it must be told that it is also a thicker and just a bit heavier device. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a bit better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.