Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 overall score. Although Galaxy A52 is newer than Galaxy Z Flip, it's a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a quite better pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.