Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting an 88.5 score against 75.8. Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, but it's also heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a better CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, it also counts with a much better video definition and a larger sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.