Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy C5, having a general score of 88.5 against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer, but a little thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy C5.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C5, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a larger screen and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.