Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy F41's 85.2 score. Even when Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy F41 were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version, so it offers lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse display density, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy F41 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 82 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.