Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy F62's 88.1 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11, providing you lots of additional features and performance improvements. Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Galaxy F62, but it is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit inferior pixels amount in each inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a same size display. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.