Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Galaxy J8's 76.7 overall score. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J8, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy J8 has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better display than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a quite larger display, a much greater pixel number per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a camera with way less megapixels and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy J8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J8 features a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.