Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | PLS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Galaxy M12, having an 88.5 score against 80. The Galaxy Z Flip design is lighter and thinner than the Galaxy M12, although it was released just 13 months before. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy M12 has Android 10, so it provides the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a way greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip and the Galaxy M12 feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy M12 has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy M12 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.