Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30, getting an 88.5 score against 82.4. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M30.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit better screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.