Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's score of 88.5. Although the Galaxy Note10 and the Galaxy Z Flip were released only 6 months apart, Galaxy Note10's construction is just a bit lighter but also a bit thicker. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note10. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy Note10's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy Z Flip, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and the same camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Galaxy Note10 feature extremely similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Note10 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.