Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Galaxy Note10 Lite, getting an 88.5 score against 86.2. Even when Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy Note10 Lite were only released 1 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11 version, so it offers lots of additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little better display pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.