Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy Note3, although it's also just a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a little greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse video definition and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.