Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Galaxy Note4, with an 88.5 score against 77.6. Galaxy Z Flip's body is noticeably newer and thinner, but just a bit heavier than Galaxy Note4. Galaxy Note4 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a quite better display pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a worse video definition and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a larger back camera sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.