Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, with an 88.5 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch of display and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with higher video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.