Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 overall score. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite higher pixels count per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S10 Lite. They have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.