Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. Despite being the best device in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also a little heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636, a quite larger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.